|  |  |  Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979CE for Psychologist, Social Worker, Counselor, & MFT!!
 Section 4 Group-Based Victim Intervention
  |  
| 
 Read content below or listen to audio.
 Left click audio track to Listen;  Right click  to "Save..." mp3
 In the last section, we discussed five advanced techniques  that students can use to deal with verbal bullying.  These five techniques are Tone Twisters,  Disconnected Comments, Playing the Game, Blocks, and Pushes. In this section... we will discuss helping students fight  bullying as a group by using the Anti - Meanness Chart. Remember Brandy from the last section?  Brandy stated, "I’m having pretty good luck  with the advanced techniques we talked about.   Stephanie gets really confused when I use the Tone Twister with  her.  She’s hasn’t been calling me names  so much.  But it’s not like I don’t have  other bullies to deal with.  And my  friends get picked on, too.  Sometimes I  feel like bullying is just too big of a problem for me to deal with." ♦     Anti-Meanness ClubI stated to Brandy, "I noticed you mentioned that some of  your friends are also bullied.  Do you  think that teaming up to deal with bullying together might make the problem  seem less overwhelming?"
 Brandy stated, "Yeah, I guess so.  I already taught my friend Alice about some  of the stuff  I’ve learned.  But what are we supposed to do, like, start  an Anti-Meanness club!?" I stated to Brandy, "Actually, that’s not a bad idea. It wouldn’t have to be a formal club, or  something you put up posters for at school. But you and your friends could make a commitment together to deal with  bullying sort of as a team, and help each other learn new techniques.  You could also track your progress together." I explained to Brandy that one way an Anti-Meanness group or  club could organize to keep track of their progress is to have each member keep  an Anti-Meanness chart. 
 ♦ Anti-Meanness Chart
 The  Anti-Meanness chart breaks learning to deal with bullies into four steps.
 
 1. The first Anti Meanness step is not returning meanness with  meanness.
 2. The second Anti-Meanness step  is using the techniques we have discussed on the previous sections to interrupt  and confuse a bully who is using meanness to hurt others.
 3.  The third Anti-Meanness step is thinking  about a situation after it happens, if you were not able to figure out what to  do at the time.
 4. And fourth, think about the  day at school and decided whether you had any meanness directed at you.
 I stated to Brandy, "To help each other use these tools, you  can put each of these four steps into the Anti-Meanness chart.  Each time you successfully use one of these  steps, you can award yourself or your friends points."  To make the Anti-Meanness Chart, your client  starts on the left hand side of your paper.   Write, "Anti-Meanness steps".   Below this, list the following steps: 
  
    I did       not use insults, arguments, "shoulds", accusations, or explanations to       handle meanness today (5 points)
    I was       able to handle someone’s meanness with compliments, questions, agreements,       golden nuggets, I-statements, understanding, reversers, tone twisters,       disconnects, blocks, pushers, or humor (5 points)
    When I       got stumped by meanness, I was able to figure out what I could have said       later (5 points)
    No       meanness came my way today.  I must       be doing something right! (3 points) Below these steps, make a box labeled, "Total".  An example of the Anti-Meanness chart is  included in the back of the Manual that accompanies this course. Across the top, write the days of the week. I stated to  Brandy, "Each day, mark how many points you have earned on the chart, and write  the total for the day at the bottom.   Everyone in your Anti-Meanness group can keep track of how many points  she or he earns during the week.  At the  end of the week, you can congratulate each other for your points."  ♦     Group Efforts with the Anti-Meaness Chart For students using the Anti Meanness chart to facilitate a group effort to deal with bullying at  school, I often recommend that the group agree ahead of time on rewards that  can be given out when the members total their points at the end of the week.  For example, Brandy’s group decided that the  member with the most points each week would be treated to lunch.  Brandy’s group also decided that any member  of the Anti Meanness group who earned over 50 points in a week would get a  small prize, such as stickers, a new pencil, or a hair decoration.
 ♦     Using the Anti-Meaness Chart with Parents Another use of the Anti-Meanness chart involves the parents  of the child who is being bullied or dealing with meanness at school.  Nathan, age 7, had been brought to see me by  his father, Luke.  Luke was highly concerned  about Nathan’s response to bullying at school.   Recently, Nathan had become aggressive in response to verbal bullying,  and had been sent home from school on one occasion after he bit the boy who had  been bullying him.
 After I explained to Luke how to make an Anti-Meanness chart  with Nathan, I stated, "It might be helpful to post an Anti-Meanness chart for  each week in a location that both you and Nathan see regularly, maybe on a  corkboard right outside his room.  You  might set a time every day when you and Nathan can mark his points for the day  on the chart.  This gives you an  opportunity every day to discuss with Nathan how things are going at  school.  Agree with Nathan ahead of time  how many points he will need to earn to receive a reward.  The reward can be anything that you think  would be motivating to Nathan, but I do suggest that the reward is not  food-oriented."  Of course open  communication is the key to discourage dishonesty to get the reward and impress  the child’s parent. Think of your Nathan.   Would helping her or his parents implement the Anti-Meanness chart be  useful to her or him? In this section... we have discussed helping students fight  bullying as a group by using the Anti - Meanness Chart. In the next section... we will discuss two  concepts for helping students work together to deal with bullying at  school.  These two concepts are,  intervening, and the anti-meanness test.Reviewed 2023
 
 Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
 Bell, C. D., Raczynski, K. A., & Horne, A. M. (2010). Bully Busters abbreviated: Evaluation of a group-based bully intervention and prevention program. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(3), 257–267.
 
 Clark, K. N., Eldridge, M. A., Dorio, N. B., Demaray, M. K., & Smith, T. J. (2021). Bullying, victimization, and bystander behavior: Risk factors across elementary–middle school transition. School Psychology.
 
 Goldstein, S. P., Goldstein, C. M., Bond, D. S., Raynor, H. A., Wing, R. R., & Thomas, J. G. (2019). Associations between self-monitoring and weight change in behavioral weight loss interventions. Health Psychology, 38(12), 1128–1136.
 
 Hayes, J. F., Fowler, L. A., Balantekin, K. N., Rotman, S. A., Altman, M., & Wilfley, D. E. (2021). Child and family predictors of relative weight change in a low-income, school-based weight management intervention. Families, Systems, & Health, 39(2), 316–326.
 
 Juvonen, J., Schacter, H. L., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2016). Can a school-wide bullying prevention program improve the plight of victims? Evidence for risk × intervention effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(4), 334–344.
 
 Midgett, A., Doumas, D. M., Myers, V. H., Moody, S., & Doud, A. (2021). Technology-based bullying intervention for rural schools: Perspectives on needs, challenges, and design. Journal of Rural Mental Health, 45(1), 14–30.
 
 Nickerson, A. B., & Mele-Taylor, D. (2014). Empathetic responsiveness, group norms, and prosocial affiliations in bullying roles. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(1), 99–109.
 
 Puhl, R. M., Himmelstein, M. S., & Watson, R. J. (2019). Weight-based victimization among sexual and gender minority adolescents: Implications for substance use and mental health. Health Psychology, 38(8), 727–737.
 
 Wójcik, M., & Mondry, M. (2020). “The game of bullying”: Shared beliefs and behavioral labels in bullying among middle schoolers. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 24(4), 276–293.
 QUESTION 4 What are the three anti-meanness steps? 
To select and enter your answer go to .
 
 
 
 
 
 |