![]() Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979 CE for Psychologist, Social Worker, Counselor, & MFT!!
Section 10 Question 10 | Test | Table of Contents Even though there is no scientific basis for generalizing that LGBTI people are diseased, medical practice has for many decades tried to transform these people into the social norm of a heterosexist gender binary. Using whatever techniques are available or fashionable, medical practice has aimed to "cure" diseases that don't exist, thereby violating the Hippocratic Oath and abusing the human rights of a diverse people. Specifically, therapists have tortured gay and lesbian people with a technique called aversion therapy. The person, say a gay man, is brought to the clinic, exposed to erotic photographs of nude men, and then punished for any signs of arousal. In theory, the man is supposed to associate the erotic photograph with pain and learn somehow not to be aroused-much as a mouse is trained with rewards or punishment in operant conditioning. The punishments used can only be described as diabolical. In the 19605 the drug apomorphine was administered to induce vomiting (or hypnosis might be used to cause uncontrollable nausea); in the 1970S electric shock therapy was added, sessions sometimes lasting thirty minutes, repeated twenty or more times over several months. People were not only traumatized but physically burned. Even worse, electroconvulsive shock therapy (ECT), administered by either delivering shocks to the head or giving the drug metrazol, induced epileptic seizures with side effects of memory impairment and depression that could last for years. After years of study,
however, behavioral scientists have failed to come up with a theory or a cure
for gayness; indeed, they have gradually thrown in the towel. In 1973 the
American Psychiatric Association removed homosexuality from its list of mental
disorders, but psychoanalysts persisted in describing homosexuality as a perversion
well into the 19905. Finally, in December 1998, the American Psychoanalytic Association,
in its annual meeting in Manhattan, acknowledged its "own past homophobia,"
in part because of the coming out of a prominent Atlanta psychoanalyst. But does this mean the spectre of a "cure" has disappeared? No. It's latest guise may be the promise of selective abortion of gay babies. A quotation from Time illustrates how claims of medical virtue can camouflage a social agenda: "Parents can use preimplantation genetic diagnosis to avoid having kids with attention-deficit disorder, say, or those predestined to be short or dull-witted or predisposed to homosexuality." Notice the clever-and dangerous-juxtaposition of homosexuality with dull-wittedness and attention-deficit disorder. Hollywood, too, has taken up the issue of aborting a supposedly gay baby in the popular movie Twilight of the Golds, starring Faye Dunaway. Selecting babies to fit political specifications could fire competition among various biological constituencies, each with its own genetic agenda. If anti-gay groups breed gayness out of babies, pro-gay groups might breed gayness back in, thus conserving, or even expanding, the presence of gayness in the human gene pool. Thank goodness there isn't a simply gay gene. Let's
be clear: you can't cure homosexuality because there's no disease to cure. But
I hesitate to become overconfident, assuming that the standing of our gay sisters
and brothers as normal people has been permanently enfranchised by the vote of
psychologists. What can be won by a vote can be lost by a vote. The value and
naturalness of homosexuality must be as scientifically clear as the fact that
the earth is round. Then the acceptance of homosexuality will not crumble when
the political pendulum next swings. Update Kuzyk, O., Gendron, A., Lopez, L. S., & Bukowski, W. M. (2022). Gender and contextual variations in self-perceived cognitive competence. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 919870. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.919870 QUESTION 10
|