|  |  |  Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979CE for Psychologist, Social Worker, Counselor, & MFT!! 
 Section 13 Active Response in Borderline Personality Disorder
  |  
| 
 Read content below or listen to audio.
 Left click audio track to Listen;  Right click  to "Save..." mp3
 In the last section, we discussed the various triggers of  defensive anger in BPD clients. These triggers are criticism; fear of  unworthiness; and helplessness. As you already know, anger for most BPD clients results from  a certain need not being met.  The pain  that the client feels will most often produce angry outbursts because the  client has not yet learned a less aggressive response. To remedy this, I give my clients response  choices to express their needs without resorting to anger.  
 In this section, we  will discuss active response choices. These response choices help the client to fully express the need or want  that is not being met. I feel that these  response choices are effective when the client knows the other person  well. Active response choices, although  rational, may also seem slightly aggressive or needy to someone the client has  just met. The various active response  choices include expressing a specific  need; negotiating; and ultimatums.
 Three Active Response Choices  ♦     #1 Expressing a Specific NeedThe first active response is expressing a specific need.  I ask my clients to open up with this line,  filling in the blanks:  "I’m feeling  ______.  And what I think I  need/want/would like in this situation is ______."  Lucy was a 24 year old BPD client.  I asked Lucy to memorize this line the next  time she was feeling hurt or upset, the emotional triggers for her anger.  I asked Lucy to keep her requests behavioral rather  than attitudinal.
 To ask someone to be  more loving, responsible, or caring is a broad request and, I have found,  frequently leads to disappointment and miscommunication.  Instead, I asked Lucy to be specific about  the certain actions she wishes the other person to take.  Also, I asked Lucy to have a fallback  position, or the minimal behavioral change she would compromise with.  Lucy was upset with her boyfriend because he  kept setting up dates with friends that she did not like.   Lucy stated, "I always feel pressured around  them, and unsure of myself.  I really  wish John wouldn’t invite them along."   To express to John her feelings without the use of anger, Lucy stated,  "What bothers me is you’re making dates with people I’m not sure I want to  see.  What I’d like is for  you to check with me first before making any  arrangements."  As a fallback position,  Lucy asked John to at least tell his friends that she might not be able to come  along.  As you can see, by stating her  needs rationally rather than aggressively, Lucy accomplished her goal and her  relationship remained intact.   ♦     #2 NegotiatingI find that the second active response is negotiating.  This active response is helpful when the BPD client  and the other person have reached an impasse.   It is designed to engage the other person in problem-solving, not  conflict. Jill was a 31 year old BPD client  whose brother was not participating in the care of their invalid mother.  Jill was feeling used and upset that Kyle  constantly made excuses to not see her. When expressing a specific need did not work, I asked Jill to move on to  this line: "What would you propose to solve this problem?"
 I asked Jill to remember that when working  toward a compromise, each person’s needs must be met.  I suggested to Jill that if Kyle suggested a  worthless or resistant position, to offer a fallback proposal. However, if his suggestion had potential, to  begin to negotiate. I gave Jill some  suggestions to keep in mind when negotiating. 
 "My way  this time, your way next time."
 "Meeting  halfway, or splitting the difference."
 "Try it my  way for a week and see.  If you don’t  like it, we’ll go back to the old way."
 
 When Jill confronted her brother Kyle, she told him she felt  overwhelmed and asked him to visit their mother twice a week, bringing her a  meal, cleaning up her place, and staying long enough for a meaningful  conversation.  Kyle met her suggestion  with resistance, stating, "I’ve got a full life, Jill.  A law practice, two kids, I can’t do that."  Jill then stated, "OK.  What would you propose to solve this  problem?"
 Again, Kyle resisted.  Jill then presented her fallback position,  "How about at least visiting twice a week, forget bringing dinner?"  Again Kyle refused, but suggested paying a  service to bring their mother dinner.   Jill consented to this, but also stated, "But she also needs to see  you.  How about you pay for someone two  nights a week, and you visit once a week?"   Kyle consented to this.   Jill  later stated to me, "It was great.  I  didn’t get angry because I knew the whole time something was actually going to  get done.  I had to tell myself that this  way was better, even though I still kind of wanted to get angry."  As you can see, Jill also accomplished her  goal through an active response.   Think  of your Jill.  Could he or she benefit  from negotiating? ♦     #3 Ultimatums In addition to expressing a specific need and negotiating,  the third active response choice is an ultimatum.  If the other person in the conflict is not  willing to compromise or fulfill the BPD client’s need, I ask the client to  state the steps he or she would have to take to fulfill his or her own  need.  However, to avoid sounding as  though the client is trying to punish or take revenge on the other person, I  ask him or her to frame the statement as a step towards self-care.  For instance, I ask my BPD clients to use the  following statement when stating an ultimatum:   If the problem goes on, I’ll have to _____ in order to take care of  myself."
 Typical ways which this  response can be used is:  paying someone  else to do it; doing it themselves; getting the help of an authority figure;  withdrawing from the relationship (either temporarily or permanently); or  getting the need met elsewhere.  Toby was  a 23 year old BPD client who responded to peer pressure with anger.   Toby stated, "Around my friend Jared, I  always feel pressured to impress him.  I  know he doesn’t mean it, but when I feel like he’s going too far, I get angry  and call him a bastard and whatnot."  I  asked Toby to try issuing an ultimatum the next time he felt Jared was  encroaching on Toby’s self-esteem.  This  occurred when, during dinner, Jared began to pressure Toby to go to a  strip-club.   Toby found this distasteful,  and told Jared he did not want to go. Jared began to taunt Toby, calling him a faggot and questioning his  sexuality.  At last, Toby issued this  ultimatum, "Jared, if you press me again about the strip club, I’m going to  just pay the bill and leave.  We’ll go  bowling tomorrow, but I’ll pack it in for the night."  Jared took Toby at his word and dropped the  matter.  By issuing an ultimatum in this  case, Toby was able to retain his anger from flaring up.  Think of your Toby.  Could he or she benefit from issuing an  ultimatum? In this section, we presented active response choices for BPD  clients, which included  expressing a  specific need; negotiating; and ultimatums. In the next section, we will examine passive response choices  for BPD clients, which include  getting  information; acknowledging; and withdrawal.   Also, we will include Guidelines for All Response Choices.Reviewed 2023
 Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References: Bateman, A., & Fonagy, P. (2019). A randomized controlled trial of a mentalization-based intervention (MBT-FACTS) for families of people with borderline personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(1), 70–79.
 
 Daros, A. R., Williams, G. E., Jung, S., Turabi, M., Uliaszek, A. A., & Ruocco, A. C. (2018). More is not always better: Strategies to regulate negative mood induction in women with borderline personality disorder and depressive and anxiety disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 9(6), 530–542.
 
 DeShong, H. L., Grant, D. M., & Mullins-Sweatt, S. N. (2019). Precursors of the emotional cascade model of borderline personality disorder: The role of neuroticism, childhood emotional vulnerability, and parental invalidation. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(4), 317–329
 
 Gratz, K. L., Dixon-Gordon, K. L., & Tull, M. T. (2014). Predictors of treatment response to an adjunctive emotion regulation group therapy for deliberate self-harm among women with borderline personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 5(1), 97–107.
 
 Gratz, K. L., Richmond, J. R., Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Chapman, A. L., & Tull, M. T. (2019). Multimodal assessment of emotional reactivity and regulation in response to social rejection among self-harming adults with and without borderline personality disorder. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 10(5), 395–405.
 .
 Ruocco, A. C., Laporte, L., Russell, J., Guttman, H., & Paris, J. (2012). Response inhibition deficits in unaffected first-degree relatives of patients with borderline personality disorder. Neuropsychology, 26(4), 473–482.
 
 QUESTION 13
 What are three active response choices? 
To select and enter your answer go to .
 
  
      
 
 |