|  Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979CE for Psychologist, Social Worker, Counselor, & MFT!!
 Section 4Reflective Practice in Supervision
 |  |  Read content below or listen to audio.Left click audio track to Listen; Right click  to "Save..." mp3
 In the last section, we discussed the  contracting process, and the five main benefits provided from contracting.  These benefits are, both parties become actively involved in the supervision  process, a contract provides a clear perception of goals, the supervisor and  supervisee create a clear picture of what their work looks like together,  contracting creates mutuality and guards against the abuse of power, and  contracts minimize covert agendas. I also provided you with a supervisee six-point  approach assessment regarding development of a supervision contract.  In this section, we will discuss taking  a reflective approach to supervision.  Do  you ever feel like saying to your supervisee, "move over; let me take over"? I  find that the biggest difficulty for me in training supervisees and supervisors  in the reflective process is to step back when a dilemma is presented, and not  answer the supervisee’s questions directly. Have you felt, as I have, the temptation to act as a therapist first, and give ‘brilliant’ advice to solve  the supervisee’s problem?  Clearly, this is most difficult for the beginning  supervisor, who feels pressure to generate answers and perform credibly by  being helpful. When the goal of supervision is to train the supervisee in the  reflective approach, the supervisor can instead encourage the reflective  process, rather than showing the supervisee how the ‘best’ therapy might look.  At the end of this section, I will describe how I encouraged the reflective  approach in my supervisee, Laura, while not robbing her of the opportunity to  grow.  ♦ 3 Reflective Dimensions  When training supervisees in the reflective  process, I explain that reflectivity is best described in three dimensions.
 Dimension #1 -  In the first reflective dimension, attention  is focused simultaneously on the interaction between the client and therapist.  Also in the first dimension of reflectivity, attention is focused on the  therapist’s own actions, emotions, and thoughts. This includes active and  critical inquiry into the supervisee’s covert and overt behavior during the  session as well as the intention of  the supervisee to examine his or her actions.  Dimension #2 - The second dimension of a reflective approach  to supervision and in their session with a client is, maintaining openness to  alternatives for interpretation. This second dimension of reflectivity also  involves the willingness to become vulnerable and try out new ideas both in a  supervisory session and in sessions with clients.
 Dimension #3 - The third dimension I describe to  the supervisee, in addition to the focus of attention on the interaction; and openness  to alternatives, is the ability to use both clinical theory and the  supervisee’s own past experiences to refine his or her clinical technique. For  example, if a supervisee had an alcoholic parent in their background, this may  aid them regarding insights into a client struggling with an abusive parental  situation.
 ♦ Laura: Reflective Learning Case Study While supervising Laura, she  brought a dilemma to my attention that I found to be an excellent opportunity  to encourage reflective learning. My primary goal was to enlist Laura’s  collaboration in our mutual effort to understand the events of the counseling  session. I hoped to engage her curiosity to the degree that it could override any anxiety she might feel in discussing the case with me. During our regular  meeting, Laura was concerned about a particular female client.
 Three Dimensions of Reflective Learning  --1. Intention to Examine One's own ActionsLaura stated,  "my client told me that during the physical part of her relationship with her  current boyfriend, she can’t tell the difference between him and anyone else  she’s been with. I thought that was kind of odd, maybe psychotic…" Here, I  encouraged Laura to focus on her thoughts during the session, by  stating, "so when you were with this client, you were trying to figure out what  this meant?" This gave Laura the opportunity to describe not only the session  with the client more completely, but her thought process during the session.
 After Laura had described the  session more completely, I directed her to focus on her feelings experienced during the session. For example, when Laura stated, "I had never  heard of anything like this before, and wanted to know if it was normal," I  stated, "so you were worried?" Laura admitted that she had felt worried and uncomfortable during the session, and restated that she felt concerned that her  patient may be exhibiting signs of psychosis.  I took this opportunity to ask Laura  questions that revolved around the meaning she made of the experience in the session with her client, and to encourage her  to discuss actions she was considering taking. As we have discussed, it is  important when training supervisee to use reflection both with clients and with  future supervisees, to encourage thought and discussion about the nature of an  interaction. In Laura’s case, I specifically asked, "What was the nature and  feeling of your interaction with your client?" Laura stated, "I don’t connect  with her as well as with my other clients."  I rephrased Laura’s own concerns  and presented them to her for clarification, saying "so it sounds like your  client may not have had a good relationship history, and may be hard to form a  relationship with." Laura stated, "yes, but I think she’s a good client to work  with. She always answers questions and tries to be clear, and she comes to all  of her appointments." --2. Maintaining Openness to Alternatives Since Laura had observed and  described a positive working relationship with her client, I next encouraged Laura  to come up with several alternative techniques she might try in her next  session. Laura stated, "well, I’d like to know if her disconnection from her  boyfriend is connected to something in her past. So I might ask about that." I  responded, "ah, so you’re interested in the similarities between this  relationship and her past relationships. It sounds like you have a plan you’re  willing to try."
 --3. Ability to Use Theory and Past Experiences to Refine Technique As you know, it is important in supervision to check for understanding in terms of theory and experience when  supervising. I usually ask my supervisees to reflect on what kind of theory  they are using to understand their clients, as I find that novice counselors  often do not make the connection between the lens they are using to understand,  and a theory they have learned in an academic setting.
  Laura stated that she  felt that she was using a combination of inter-personal theory and  psychodynamic theory, which I affirmed, as I felt it was an accurate  description of her experience. I also asked Laura, "besides these theories and  your experience with this client, what else do you use to understand her? Are  there any past experiences that may have helped you?"  Laura stated, "well, I think I’m not very judgmental, I can ask about things outside of my experience and not have a  strong reaction. I think that helps. And I’m very curious- one time I met a  homeless man in New York, and I  ended up talking to him for quite a while because his experiences were so  different, and I kept having questions."   Clearly, this allowed Laura not only to reflect on frames of reference  in her own life that helped her create a strong counseling image, but also to  reflect on her strengths as a counselor, allowing her to gain confidence. Finally, before ending my  supervising session with Laura, I asked her to reflect on her experience  discussing the client with me, ensuring that she had gotten what she needed  from our interaction. In my experience, practicing this  pattern in interacting with supervisees helps them to develop a reflective  process of thinking about difficulties with clients that helps them long after  our relationship ends. I also find this essential to use when training  supervisors, as the novice supervisor’s attempts to encourage reflectivity in  their supervisees helps them to use reflectivity when improving their skills of  supervision, and create better interactions with their supervisees. Would you  agree? In this section, we have discussed  the reflective approach to supervision, and methods to encourage the growth of  the reflective process in supervisees and trainee supervisors. The three  dimensions of the reflective approach are the intention to examine one’s own  actions, maintaining openness to alternatives, and the ability to use theory  and past experiences to refine clinical technique. In the next section, we will discuss the  three common perspectives in multi-cultural counseling. We will also discuss  techniques by which to encourage the growth of multicultural counseling skills  within supervisees.Reviewed 2023
 
 Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
 Aarts, H. (2019). Goal setting theory and the mystery of setting goals. Motivation Science, 5(2), 106–107.
 
 Amaro, C. M., Mitchell, T. B., Cordts, K. M. P., Borner, K. B., Frazer, A. L., Garcia, A. M., & Roberts, M. C. (2020). Clarifying   supervision expectations: Construction of a clinical supervision   contract as a didactic exercise for advanced graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 14(3), 235–241.
 
 Borelli, J. L., Sohn, L., Wang, B. A., Hong, K., DeCoste, C., & Suchman, N. E. (2019). Therapist–client language matching: Initial promise as a measure of therapist–client relationship quality. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 36(1), 9–18.
 
 Cooper, L. D., & Wieckowski, A. T. (2017). A structured approach to reflective practice training in a clinical practicum. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 11(4), 252–259.
 
 Curtis, D. F., Elkins, S. R., Duran, P., & Venta, A. C. (2016). Promoting a climate of reflective practice and clinician self-efficacy in vertical supervision. Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 10(3), 133–140.
 
 Frølund, L., & Nielsen, J. (2009). The reflective meta-dialogue in psychodynamic supervision. Nordic Psychology, 61(4), 85–105.
 QUESTION 4  What are the Three Dimensions of Reflective Learning? To select and enter your answer go to .
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |