|  |  |  Healthcare Training Institute - Quality Education since 1979CE for Psychologist, Social Worker, Counselor, & MFT!! 
 Section
      1Negotiation Strategies In Addiction Affected Families
  |  
|  | 
 Read content below or listen to audio.
 Left click audio track to Listen;  Right click  to "Save..." mp3
   In this section, we will discuss the five different negotiation styles found
  in the families of addicts: Adversaries, aggressors, appeasers, avoiders, and
  analysts, as well as the constructive form of negotiation, the ambassador. I find there are five types of negotiation styles found in the families
    of addicts: adversary, aggressor, appeaser, avoider, and analyst.
  Each of these styles unwittingly supports addiction. As you
  are aware, family members of addicts believe they are working
  to better the situation; but they can usually recognize how other members
  of the family enable the addiction.  There is a sixth negotiation style,
  the ambassador, that does not spontaneously occur in the families
  of addicts. I find that one goal of treating the family of an addict is to
  transform all of the members into ambassadors. 6 Negotiation Styles  ♦ Negotiation Style # 1 - Adversary The first type of negotiation style I find in the families of addicts
    is the adversary. The adversary is the addict, or, more precisely, the addiction
    itself. The adversary needs to win at all costs. Since the addict believes
    they need their alcohol or drug to survive, every negotiation is perceived
    as a fight for their life. As a result, the adversary is hostile, inflexible,
    aggressive, and secretive. They use threats to intimidate, or lies to pacify.
    The adversary, as you know,  manages
  their addiction by managing the family. There is no middle
  ground; the goal is to protect the addiction and avoid pain. To an adversary,
  solutions are seen as threats.
 ♦ Negotiation Style # 2 - AggressorsThe second type, Aggressors, deflect input from other people.
  They want to deal with the addict in their own way, and refuse
  to change their way of thinking once they have made up their minds. Aggressors
  are more interested in protecting their own point of view
  than in exploring solutions. They tend to bully others into
  submission, and over time become increasingly hostile, facilitating a breakdown
  in family communication.
 ♦ Negotiation Style # 3 - Appeasers Appeasers fluctuate between playing the rescuer and
  the victim. They do not believe they can win, so they settle for
  a life that isn’t too unpleasant. They try to protect what they have,
  rather than work towards a solution. Appeasers are always busy ‘helping’,
  but are unwilling to work towards meaningful change; they
  submit to the addict’s threats and are easily intimidated. Appeasers
  work hard to resolve the daily problems of addicts, because they believe that
  the only way they will not lose is if the addict does not
  lose.
 ♦ Negotiation Style # 4 - AvoidersIn addition to adversaries, aggressors, and appeasers, Avoiders don’t
  like conflict. They ignore problems by hiding, stalling, or
  delaying. Avoiders often live in self-imposed isolation. Because they cut themselves
  off from cooperative efforts, avoiders are at a greater disadvantage than other
  negotiators. They believe they have no choice but to withdraw, and their goal
  is just to survive. Avoiders see suggested solutions as intrusions into
  the addict’s right to self-determination. Over time, avoiders become
  lonely, unfulfilled, and fearful.
 ♦ Negotiation Style # 5 - AnalystsIn addition to adversaries, aggressors, appeasers, and avoiders, I
    find that the final negotiation style found in the families of addicts is
    analysts. Analysts are always trying to understand. They displace primary
    problems onto something else, redirecting emotion from a threatening situation
    to a safer one. An analysts will see low self-esteem as the problem, rather
    than addiction.  Analysts avoid taking action by always looking
  for more information, and by picking apart situations. These individuals tie
  themselves up in logic to avoid feeling. Analysts usually end up becoming emotionally
  detached from others in their family.
 ♦ Negotiation Style # 6 - AmbassadorsAmbassadors, who are family members of the addict, are ideal
  negotiators. These are individuals motivated by love for their family, and
  by zero tolerance for untreated addiction. Ambassadors are able to differentiate
    between the disease of addiction and the person suffering from it. An ambassadors
    motto is "we will not give in to the disease". When provoked,
    an ambassador responds quickly and firmly, drawing a line
  between working for recovery and supporting addiction. A key skill of an ambassador
  is maintaining a firm stance while keeping relationships with the addict in
  their lives, leaving the door open for future negotiations.
 ♦ How to     Become an Ambassador Becoming an ambassador is a conscious choice for the family
  members of an addict. It requires learning new skills, and often family members
  need professional guidance. Once the family does learn to be ambassadors, it
  is difficult for even the most recalcitrant addict to resist. John and Betty’s
  32-year-old son Ben had been addicted to cocaine for many years.
 
 Every time
  they tried to discuss the addiction with Ben, he told them "If you ever
  have an intervention with me, I’ll never speak to you again! I know all
  about those things anyway; it won’t work on me." John and Betty
  always acquiesced. They didn’t understand that Ben’s addiction
  was using the statement "it won’t work on me" as a way of
  protecting itself. Fortunately, Ben’s two sisters insisted on intervention.
 Although John
  and Betty were convinced they would not succeed, they joined their daughters
  in the training process for intervention, and did everything recommended. John,
  Betty, their daughters, and several of Ben’s friends joined the training,
  and learned to become ambassadors. 
 At the end of the intervention for Ben, John turned to his son and said "Will you accept the help we
  are offering you?". Ben looked up at John and said "Where do you
  want me to go?" By learning the skills to become an ambassador, John
  was able to get through to Ben and get him into a treatment program.
 ♦ Confrontation Role-Play TechniqueI used the Confrontation Role-Play Technique with John, his
  family, and Ben’s friends.
 -- Step # 1 - 
  I had the group divide into groups of three:
  one playing the adversary, one the ambassador, and the third as an observer.
 -- Step # 2 - 
  During the role-play, the observer made note of the constructive skills
  used by the ambassador; for example, the use of personal statements, behavior
  descriptions, direct statement of personal feelings, understanding and interpretive
  responses, and constructive feedback.
 -- Step # 3 - 
  After the role-plays were complete, we
  discussed the results as a large group. Early on, we role-played generalized
  situations - one example was to role-play a confrontation with an adversary
  who frequently embarrassed others with bad table manners and offensive jokes.
 -- Step # 4 - 
  As the group progressed, we began role-playing confrontation situations more
  specific to the family’s situation with Ben. Have you considered using
  this or a similar role-playing technique involving the family of an addict?
 In this section, we have discussed the six negotiation styles found
    in the families of addicts - adversaries, aggressors, appeasers, avoiders,
    and analysts, as well as the constructive ambassador form of negotiation.
  Would it be helpful to play this section during your next session with your client
  who is the family member of an addict? In the next section, we will discuss preparing for a structured family intervention
  by determining if the skills of a professional interventionist are needed.Reviewed 2023
 
 Peer-Reviewed Journal Article References:
 Farmer, R. F., Seeley, J. R., Gau, J. M., Klein, D. N., Merikangas, K. R., Kosty, D. B., Duncan, S. C., & Lewinsohn, P. M. (2018). Clinical features associated with an increased risk for alcohol use disorders among family members. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 32(6), 628–638.
 
 Gregg, L., Haddock, G., Emsley, R., & Barrowclough, C. (2014). Reasons for substance use and their relationship to subclinical psychotic and affective symptoms, coping, and substance use in a nonclinical sample. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 28(1), 247–256.
 
 Henderson, C. E., Hogue, A., & Dauber, S. (2019). Family therapy techniques and one-year clinical outcomes among adolescents in usual care for behavior problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 87(3), 308–312.
 
 Leadbeater, B. J., Hellner, I., Allen, J. P., & Aber, J. L. (1989). Assessment of interpersonal negotiation strategies in youth engaged in problem behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 465–472.
 
 Rusby, J. C., Light, J. M., Crowley, R., & Westling, E. (2018). Influence of parent–youth relationship, parental monitoring, and parent substance use on adolescent substance use onset. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(3), 310–320.
 QUESTION
      1What are the five negotiation styles found in the families of addicts?
To select and enter your answer go to .
 
  
      
 
 
 
 
 |